Sean Wells
Associate
London
sean.wells@lw.com
+44.20.7710.4662
PRACTICES
- Capital Markets
- Financial Regulatory
INDUSTRIES
- Financial Institutions
- Fintech
EDUCATION
- Legal Practice Course, BPP Law School, 2017
Distinction - Law, University of Kent, 2016
First Class, Faculty Prize for Outstanding Overall Degree Performance, Gardner Croft Prize for Best Negotiation Team, CEDR National Negotiation Competition Winner
LANGUAGES SPOKEN
- English
PROFILE
Sean Wells is an associate in the London office of Latham & Watkins and a member of the global Financial Institutions Industry Group and Financial Regulatory Practice.
Sean provides regulatory advice to financial institutions on a broad range of domestic and cross-border regulatory issues in both a transactional and pure advisory context, including:
- Time-sensitive internal regulatory investigations
- FCA filings (including new license applications, change in controller filings, Form As, etc.)
- The scope and application of the FCA Handbook’s rules (including COBS, SYSC, PERG, etc.)
- The regulatory implications of transactions involving UK regulated entities
Sean is a member of the Latham & Watkins First Generation Professionals and Parent Lawyers Affinity Groups and maintains an ongoing commitment to his pro bono practice.
EXPERIENCE
Sean’s experience includes advising:
- A large international bank on securing FCA authorization for a new business, and the development of the new business’s systems, controls, and governance arrangements to ensure operational readiness upon launch
- A financial services institution through an internal regulatory investigation in relation to potential market abuse offences, involving the provision of detailed MAR analysis
- Lithia Motors, Inc. on its acquisition of the Jardine Motors Group from Jardine Matheson, and its acquisition of Pendragon plc’s motor business
- Private equity clients on the regulatory implications of transactions involving UK regulated entities
- Multiple clients on whistleblowing investigations
- Multiple clients on the scope and applicability of MAR to specific transactions