Chris Brown is a litigation and trial associate in the Washington, D.C. office of Latham & Watkins.
Mr. Brown represents clients in antitrust litigation and during merger clearance. Mr. Brown has worked on antitrust litigation from the filing of the complaint through discovery, dispositive motions, and trial. He has assisted clients in advocating before the Department of Justice Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission regarding antitrust enforcement and merger clearance. His litigation experience includes monopolization, monopsonization, and merger challenges brought by both the government and private litigants. His experience spans across industries, including agricultural products, government contracting, information technology, pharmaceuticals, and manufactured goods. Mr. Brown helps clients navigate complex antitrust issues, including:
Merger litigation
Monopolization and attempted monopolization
Monoposonization
Capper-Volstead Act cooperative issues
Price-fixing
Conspiracy
Refusal to deal
Mr. Brown also represents clients during white collar investigations. As part of this role, he has assisted in investigations from the initial identification of a potential problem through counseling clients on addressing the results of the investigation. His work on these matters has included advocacy before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice regarding financial accounting and alleged fraud.
Mr. Brown maintains an active pro bono practice. His work includes successfully reuniting a mother with her separated child in an immigration proceeding and representing tenants. Prior to law school, Mr. Brown worked as a certified public accountant for an international accounting firm.
Experience
Mr. Brown’s litigation experience includes representing:
EverWatch Corp., a defense contractor, defeating the US Department of Justice’s challenge to Booz Allen Hamilton’s acquisition of EverWatch in a preliminary injunction hearing – United States v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (D. Md.)
United States Sugar Corp., an agricultural products company, defeating the US Department of Justice’s challenge to U.S. Sugar’s acquisition of Imperial Sugar in the US District Court of Delaware – United States v. U.S. Sugar Corp. (D. Del.)
Union Pacific Railroad, a Class I railroad, in federal court multi-district litigation alleging price-fixing claims – In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. II) (D.D.C.)
Dairy Farmers of America, an agricultural cooperative, in federal court litigation alleging conspiracy and monopsony claims – Sitts et al. v. Dairy Farmers of America (D. Vt.)
Ocean Spray, an agricultural cooperative, in federal court litigation alleging monopsony claims – Growers 1-7 et al v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. (D. Mass.)
MModal LLC, a healthcare technology company, in federal court litigation regarding Walker Process fraud counterclaims – MModal Services Ltd. v. Nuance Communications, Inc. (N.D. Ga.)
CoStar Group, a commercial real estate information and analytics company, in federal bankruptcy court litigation regarding break-up fee from abandoned acquisition of RentPath by CoStar
A Latham team led by Brendan McShane, Sadik Huseny, and Anna Rathbun were honored as winners of The American Lawyer’s Litigators of the Week for achieving a precedent-setting dismissal for Cendyn in an antitrust proposed class action.
Latham team recognized as appellate court affirms previous decisions against the US Department of Justice's challenge to U.S. Sugar's purchase of Imperial Sugar.
Appellate opinion cements earlier multi-court successes against the US Department of Justice high-profile challenge to U.S. Sugar’s purchase of Imperial Sugar.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.