Litigators of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Latham Tax Controversy team recognized for a Court of Federal Claims win on behalf of Citigroup Inc. in a dispute rooted in the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.
Partner
Jean Pawlow represents companies and individuals on high-profile tax controversy matters.
Leveraging her creative pragmatism and more than three decades of courtroom success, Jean is a strong litigator in matters of federal, state and local, and appellate tax controversies. She helps clients navigate a myriad of complex tax issues, including:
Jean has a breadth of experience in all stages of the IRS administrative process, federal litigation, and Tax Court litigation. She has litigated cases before US district and appellate courts, as well as the US Tax Court, the US Court of Federal Claims, and the US Supreme Court.
She has broad knowledge of the IRS alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, including fast-track settlement, rapid appeals, post-appeals mediation, pre-filing agreements, and compliance assurance process (CAP) audits. Jean regularly represents clients who are undergoing audits by the IRS Global High-Wealth Industry Group.
A recognized thought leader, Jean frequently speaks and writes on industry trends. She has appeared on CBS and CNBC, and was a contributing editor of Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2016.
Jean formerly served on the firm's Women Enriching Business (WEB) Committee, which promotes women in business both inside and outside the firm.
Jean’s representative experience includes:
*Matter handled prior to joining Latham
Latham Tax Controversy team recognized for a Court of Federal Claims win on behalf of Citigroup Inc. in a dispute rooted in the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.
Latham litigators recognized for a Seventh Circuit win for Netflix upholding a win for streaming services finding that East St. Louis, Illinois, can’t force them to pay franchise fees imposed on cable companies.
Latham & Watkins LLP's Jean Pawlow has represented Netflix as tax counsel in its string of successes in class actions across federal and state courts against claims that it was liable for state-based franchise fees.