"Receives high praise for his broad government contracts practice."
Chambers USA 2024
"A fantastic lawyer and a tremendous advisor."
Chambers USA 2024
"A very smart and sophisticated attorney."
Chambers USA 2024
"Highly proficient in compliance matters, bid protests, and internal investigations involving FCA and mandatory disclosure concerns."
The Legal 500 US 2024
MVP of the Year – Government Contracts
Law360 2023
Ranked – Government Contracts
Chambers USA 2021-2023
"Kyle has a diverse practice."
Chambers USA 2023
Recommended – Government Contracts
The Legal 500 US 2021-2022
"Receives high praise for his broad government contracts practice, which includes strengths in bid protests and issues related to the False Claims Act."
Chambers USA 2022
"He is a really good solid attorney. His ability and knowledge are extremely impressive."
Chambers USA 2021
Profile
Kyle Jefcoat is a litigator who advises clients on all facets of government contracts and grants, particularly relating to bid protests, False Claims Act litigation, mergers and acquisitions, and national security clearances.
Kyle combines his business-focused approach and extensive experience to guide clients, including global private equity firms and their portfolio companies, on complex compliance issues relating to:
Mergers and acquisitions, including novations
Domestic preference requirements, including the Buy American Act; Build America, Buy America; and Trade Agreements Act
Foreign Ownership Control and Influence (FOCI) disclosure and mitigation
Small business size-status and affiliation
Mandatory disclosure and code of business ethics
Organizational conflicts of interest (OCI)
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) responses and requests
Requirements to provide cost or pricing data
The suspension and debarment process
False Claims Act liability
The intersection of intellectual property and government contracts
Subcontracts, subrecipient agreements, teaming agreements, and licensing agreements, with particular attention to contract and grant flow-down requirements
In bid protest litigation, Kyle has handled a wide range of protests, from those with a few million dollars at stake to ones with billions of dollars at issue.
Kyle has assisted multiple clients with internal investigations into potential issues that raise both False Claims Act and mandatory disclosure concerns, including reviewing sales practices under clients’ GSA Schedule contracts and Price Reduction Clause compliance, as well as compliance with certifications and representations made in the process of contract award.
Before joining Latham, Kyle was a Captain in the US Air Force Judge-Advocate General (JAG) Corps from 2000 through 2004. He is also a member, and past global leader, of the firm’s US Military & Veterans Network.
Kyle maintains an active pro bono practice, including veteran benefits appeals cases and advising nonprofit organizations on compliance with government grant obligations.
Experience
Kyle has represented clients from the information technology, defense and aviation, and health care industries in protests and claims before:
Partner Kyle Jefcoat has made the most of his transition to the government contracts field from serving in the Air Force Judge Advocate General's Corps, helping secure big results for clients like a US$5 billion Navy construction deal protest win for SLS Federal Services LLC.
Multidisciplinary team represents the NASDAQ-listed technology solutions provider at the intersection of robotics, sensors, software analytics, and connectivity in all-stock transaction.
Multidisciplinary team represents the global alternative asset manager in the purchase of a majority stake in the multi-trade industrial and specialty services contractor.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.