"Samuel Pape is a star – a pleasure to work with, cool under pressure, and with perfect command of all aspects of a case."
The Legal 500 UK 2023
"Investment treaty arbitration expert."
The Legal 500 UK 2025
Next Generation Partner – International Arbitration
The Legal 500 UK 2025
"Knowledgeable and hardworking."
The Legal 500 UK 2024
Profile
Samuel Pape represents clients in a broad range of high-stakes international disputes. He is a strategic advisor and trial advocate in international commercial and investment treaty arbitration. He also acts in complex commercial litigation in England and overseas.
Samuel is widely recognized as one of the leading dispute resolution lawyers of his generation. Two of his recent arbitration wins have earned him recognition in The American Lawyer’sLitigators of the Week. Samuel is ranked as a Next Generation Partner by The Legal 500 UK 2025 and a Future Leader in Arbitration by Who’s Who Legal / Lexology 2025.
Drawing on over a decade of experience, he represents multinational companies, financial institutions, private equity firms, and sovereign States in disputes across a range of sectors including energy, mining, banking, technology, and aviation. His experience includes acting in financial, corporate, and shareholder disputes, as well as in transnational tort class actions. Samuel's cases often involve novel and complex issues, including ESG issues.
Samuel is bilingual in English and French and also speaks Spanish and Portuguese. He frequently handles disputes in Latin America and is noted as having “a fine record in the region” by TheLegal 500 Latin America.
Samuel is an active member of the international arbitration community. He is the former Representative for the United Kingdom on the ICC Young Arbitration & ADR Forum. He is also an editorial board member of the European Investment Law and Arbitration Review and has authored a number of publications. He is frequently invited to lecture and to speak on panels on subjects relating to international arbitration.
Samuel also has an active pro bono practice and is a trustee of the Free Representation Unit, a London-based charity that provides free representation to individuals who cannot afford lawyers.
Experience
Samuel's experience includes representing:
Commercial Arbitration
A leading mining company on a very high value shareholder rights and environmental dispute arising from projects in Latin America
A state-owned oil company in defending a US$1 billion HKIAC arbitration concerning alleged events of default under a loan agreement
A syndicate of banks in an LCIA arbitration enforcing equity support and completion guarantees provided in a complex Islamic project financing transaction in the renewable energy sector
A supplier of aircraft engine components in an ICC arbitration against an aircraft engine manufacturer
A technology company in an ICC arbitration against a key supplier concerning a tortious conspiracy and the non-conformity of products with contractual specification
The purchaser of an aircraft in an ICC arbitration concerning the termination of an aircraft purchase agreement and related litigation in the United States
A multinational group of companies in an ICC arbitration arising out of the termination of a Concession agreement with a State
An oil major in an ad hoc arbitration against another oil major arising out of a long-term transportation and processing contract*
Investment Treaty Arbitration
The Republic of Colombia in three ICSID arbitrations under the Canada-Colombia FTA relating to mining prohibitions adopted to protect fragile ecosystems and biodiversity in the Andes
The Republic of Colombia in an ICSID arbitration brought by a mining company under the Canada-FTA relating to the alleged failure to protect gold mining projects from artisanal and small-scale mining activities
Mason Capital in its investment treaty claim against the Republic of Korea following the exposure of corruption involving South Korean political and business leaders
A UK property development group in an ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Mauritius
A sovereign party in a PCA-administered investor-State dispute concerning a bank rescue program
Mobile TeleSystems in its US$2.5 billion investor-state arbitration against Uzbekistan brought under the Additional Facility of the ICSID, including successfully defending an Article 45(6) application*
Litigation
Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria in their defence of transnational human rights and environmental class actions
A minority shareholder in multi-billion dollar unfair prejudice petitions against the majority shareholder in a multinational joint-venture in the real estate and energy sectors
A syndicate of banks in proceedings relating to the enforcement of an LCIA arbitration award
Daewoo Motors in a challenge to an ICC arbitration award brought by General Motors arising from the acquisition of Daewoo’s automotive business*
*Matter handled prior to joining Latham
Qualifications
Bar Qualification
England and Wales (Solicitor)
Education
Legal Practice Course, College of Law, 2010 with distinction
Graduate Diploma in Law, College of Law, 2009 with distinction
BA (Hons) Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Oxford, 2008
Firm honored by Law360 for advising startups, financial institutions, VCs, digital asset and Web3 participants, and corporations on their most innovative and complex transactions, investigations, litigation, and regulatory matters.
A Latham international arbitration team earned the accolade for their second ICSID victory for the Republic of Colombia in a US$180 million dispute related to the páramos mining ban.
Latham International Arbitration team received recognition for securing a complete victory for the Republic of Colombia in a major international environmental dispute.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.