Maggie Upshaw is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of Latham & Watkins.
Maggie primarily handles appellate litigation and dispositive motions in the federal district courts. She has assisted with strategic analysis and briefing in a broad range of matters at all levels of the judiciary, including before the US Supreme Court. She has also successfully argued appeals before the Eleventh and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals, obtaining precedent-setting victories in both cases.
Maggie represents clients in a variety of substantive areas, including administrative law, securities regulation, data privacy, contracts, torts, and constitutional law. She has particular experience defending clients against complex class actions. She has been a primary drafter of briefs opposing class certification, including briefing that successfully defeated certification of a multi-billion dollar damages class.
Prior to joining Latham, Maggie served as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of the Solicitor General, where she successfully argued an appeal on behalf of the United States before the First Circuit Court of Appeals. She also clerked for Judge William Fletcher of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Maggie graduated first in her class from the University of Chicago Law School, where she received the Casper Platt Award for Most Outstanding Paper. During law school, she served as Comments Editor for The University of Chicago Law Review.
Thought Leadership
“FinCEN Looks to Rein In Cryptocurrency Transactions” Latham & Watkins Global Fintech & Payments Blog (2021)
“Will Jam v. IFC Increase Multilateral Development Banks’ US Legal Exposure?” Latham & Watkins Client Alert (2019)
The Unappealing State of Certificates of Appealability, 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1609 (2015)
Qualifications
Bar Qualification
District of Columbia
Education
JD, University of Chicago Law School, 2016 Highest Honors
Latham litigators recognized for a Seventh Circuit win for Netflix upholding a win for streaming services finding that East St. Louis, Illinois, can’t force them to pay franchise fees imposed on cable companies.
The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of Latham's client, Noris Babb, that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act allows federal employees to sue over any age bias that creeps into an adverse employment action.
Samir Deger-Sen accomplished a feat only a handful of attorneys can tout: He convinced the US Supreme Court to take up his case while a law firm associate.
Latham recognized for securing a streak of wins for Netflix which sought to force the streaming service to pay franchise fees on revenues similar to what cable companies pay towns and cities for the right to install their wires in public rights-of-way.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.